In the epilogue, the narrator ponders the evolution and usages of racial terminology over time. Do you agree or disagree with those views?
I was born in the mid-1940s, so I’ve been around for a while and I too have pondered about the English language and how it evolves, changes, comes back again. Some of the words that my grandparents used to describe people would be totally frowned upon today. They were not bad people, just products of their own time in history.
1 Like
I do believe that language evolves and some terminology is changed or excluded based on cultural sensitivities. I think the narrator made a good point that intent is what matters. Still, if terms have become offensive, hurtful, or disrespectful then people should make the effort to use newer language.
The author wrote, “I’ve found myself wondering about the root of the difference. What I’ve come up with, plain and simple, is this: intent.”
I agree.
1 Like
@Laura_D said exactly what I was thinking. “Intent.” That’s the key. It’s the meaning underlying the words that really matters. But there are certain words that have come to mean sentiments so vile and abhorrent that they simply can’t be used or justified no matter the context. That’s because of the history of the ways in which those words have been used to harm people.
I think intent can mean well intended, but well intended people can use language that is hurtful and offensive because they lack awareness. Lack of awareness does not excuse being hurtful. Now I think there is a backlash to being “woke”. To me being woke is being aware. Now it’s bad to be aware of how others feel about the language we use? After all language reflects one’s thoughts. I do understand that language evolves and so does the thinking of some people. I think the author’s note reflects her generosity of spirit.