1000 Books March 2026: What should we read?

I suggested we read in March Liar’s Poker: Rising Through the Wreckage on Wall Street, by Michael Lewis, and now I’m sorry I did.

I read it…and it’s a hard book. I write reviews of all the books I read and publish the reviews on my Facebook page, Goodreads, and BookBrowse, if BookBrowse has the book listed, which it doesn’t for “Liar’s Poker.”

Here is my review. Do y’all still want to read this for March? I just want you to know what you’re getting into. On the other hand, if you’re finance types, you might really enjoy it. It has gotten rave reviews for years from professional reviewers and readers–so I’m an outlier.

Liar’s Poker (25th Anniversary Edition): Rising Through the Wreckage on Wall Street ***
By Michael Lewis

When most of us think of Wall Street, we think of stocks, but in the roller coaster 1980s, it was bonds that actually set the tone and pace for moneymaking on Wall Street. That is the topic of this book.

And it is not an easy book to read. It is an extremely detailed and somewhat convoluted accounting of the financial arcana and complexities of the decade that eventually led to the October 19, 1987 stock market crash as revealed by author Michael Lewis, himself a bond trader with Saloman Brothers.

And while Lewis is an extraordinary writer, this book left me puzzled, confused, and hopelessly lost most of the time. On the other hand, I was an English major and not a finance major so the problem may be with me—not Lewis.

That said, the “people stories” Lewis recounts are fun to read because he tells them with such flair, insight, and humor. Yes, many parts of this book are hilarious.

Lewis, a Southerner at heart, went to Princeton University where he improbably studied art history while everyone else—it was the early 1980s—studied economics with an eye to getting a high-flying job on Wall Street. Lewis still tried to get that high-flying job on Wall Street, much to the amusement and outright laughter of the interviewers. He may have had to take no for an answer, but he didn’t give up. Smart man that he is, he went to England and got a master’s degree from the prestigious London School of Economics.

How he was hired in 1984 at the venerable Salomon Brothers is a story in and of itself involving a royal invitation to St. James Palace, his well-placed dinner partner (the wife of a high-level manager at the firm), the Queen Mother, and a pack of royal corgi dogs. And once he got the job, Lewis showed up on his first day wearing red suspenders with gold dollar signs—a definite fashion no-no. You can’t make this stuff up.

When this book didn’t have me scratching my head and squinting my eyes in a muddle of confusion, it had me laughing out loud. Seriously—it was both.

Lewis’s book is truly an insider’s story of what happened on Wall Street in the 1980s, a time when all you had to be was young, smart, and know how to work a telephone to make millions of dollars, but following Lewis’s accounting of the financial minutia, especially the advent of mortgage bond trading, was quite daunting. What is shocking is how so many customers were exploited just so Salomon Brothers could make millions. It was ruthless. Of course, many of the customers also made a fortune themselves, which is why they kept coming back for more, but not everyone can be a winner. There were plenty of losers, too. Big, big losers.

This is a book about risk-taking that makes Las Vegas look like child’s play—from selling questionable bonds to gullible customers to traders defying company management just to be noticed. Lewis never felt like he fully belonged, and that outsider-looking-in feeling is what allowed him to have the nerve to do what he did. He always assumed he would be fired, calling his job at Salomon his “rent-a-career.” He says this made him fearless, noting “I had the same advantage of recklessness as a driver in a traffic jam with a rent-a-car.”

This is an insider’s tale about a decade of financial history that will likely never be repeated. Well, let’s hope.

1 Like

In another thread, @Cathryn_Conroy said she felt bad about choosing this for the group, that it was a tough read. She wondered if, based on her review, we wanted to move forward, or have her pick five more books from which to choose. So here’s the poll. Let us know what you think!

  • Let’s move ahead with it. It’s in 1000 Books, and who knows, we may have different opinions.
  • No, let’s choose something else. It sounds like a snoozefest.
  • I don’t really care one way or the other.
0 voters

I’m somewhat confused. I have already read The Man in the High Castle for February. Does the discussion start on March1 and is the Liar’s Poker still the March book?
I am dealing with a family tragedy so I’m somewhat distracted on keeping up to date on the books for 1,000 reads.

We read the book in tbe designated month (for example, March) and the discuss in the next month (April).

I am so very sorry about your family tragedy. Read o ly what toy can, and please know we are thinking of you. I am the praying type and will include you in my prayers. May you find peace.

1 Like

To echo what Cathryn said - reading The Man in the High Castle in February, start discussion March 1.

We’re discussing Liar’s Poker, which we were planning to read in March, with the discussion opening April 1.

I’m so sorry for what you’re going through, @Lynne_G! Virtual hugs to you and yours. Please don’t worry about anything here on BookBrowse. We’ll still be here when you’re ready to jump back in.

1 Like

I was really hoping someone else would jump in there and break the three-way tie, but since that didn’t happen, I’m going to say let’s move ahead with Liar’s Poker. Mustich seemed to think it belonged on his “life changing list,” and given how widely read this group is, I think it makes sense to try to hit books that challenge us. Plus, it’s short, and if it’s becoming too painful we can just dump it.

I’ll give it a try but will dump it if it’s too heady for me. I believe I have to borrow it on audio, which might be a real bore. Then again maybe the economics will stimulate my thinking. I’ll know after an hour of listening.

2 Likes

Thanks for giving it a go, Nan!

The good news is twofold: Michael Lewis is an EXCELLENT writer and he’s funny. There are quite a few humorous anecdotes and just his take on things. It’s not all boring financial stuff.

3 Likes

I just broke it without seeing this post and agreed with what you had already decided; i.e. go ahead with Liars Poker. Sorry I didn’t see the post earlier.

1 Like